Estatísticas de Escanteios da China PR FA Cup
A média é de 9.3 escanteios por jogo na China PR FA Cup. Veja abaixo as médias por time e as porcentagens de over 8.5–9.5.
Média de escanteios por jogo: 9.3
Escanteios por time
| # | Time | Média | A favor | Contra | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Qingdao Fuli | 6.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shanghai Imair | 11.5 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 75% | 75% |
| 0 | Chongqing Handa | 7.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 8.5 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Shanghai Segenda | 7.3 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 25% | 0% |
| 0 | Guangdong Shudihong | 13.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Dalian Kewei | 6.4 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 40% | 20% |
| 0 | Yulin Miners | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Xiamen Chengyi | 9.5 | 1.5 | 8.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 11.3 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 67% | 67% |
| 0 | Hubei Istar | 9.3 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 67% | 33% |
| 0 | Ningxia Pingluo | 9.0 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 8.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Liaocheng Legend | 10.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 67% | 67% |
| 0 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 10.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Shandong Scout | — | — | — | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Beijing Pengrui | 5.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Changle Jingangtui | 6.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Hainan Shuangyu | 12.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shenzhen Xingjun | 6.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 7.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Huzhou Changxing | 6.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Dongxing Greenery | 19.0 | 4.0 | 15.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | — | — | — | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Tianjin Kaiser | — | — | — | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Beijing Smart Sky | 7.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shanxi Xiangyu | 16.0 | — | 16.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Wuchuan Youth | 8.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Wuhua Huajing | 6.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shenzhen Keysida | 13.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Nantong Home Textile | 12.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Guizhou Feiying | 13.0 | — | 13.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Hangzhou Linping Wuyue | 9.7 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 67% | 67% |
| 0 | Lanzhou Longyuan | 11.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 75% | 50% |
| 0 | Qingdao Red Lions | 10.3 | 1.0 | 9.3 | 67% | 67% |
| 0 | Jiangxi Lushan | 8.7 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 67% | 33% |
| 0 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 7.7 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Shenzhen 2028 | 10.5 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 100% | 50% |
| 0 | Beijing BIT | 11.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Haimen Codion | 11.0 | 11.0 | — | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 9.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Changchun Xidu | 8.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Xiamen Feilu | 7.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic | 6.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 13.0 | — | 13.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Wenzhou | 8.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 8.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Guangdong Mingtu | 6.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shaanxi Union FC | 9.3 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 100% | 33% |
| 0 | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 12.5 | 3.0 | 9.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shanghai Jiading Huilong | 6.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Wuxi Wugou | 7.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Suzhou Dongwu | 9.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Guangzhou E-Power FC | 9.0 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Guangxi Hengchen | 8.5 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 50% | 0% |
| 0 | Changchun Yatai | 11.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 11.0 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Nantong Zhiyun | 9.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 0% |
| 0 | Nanjing City | 11.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Foshan Nashi FC | 6.0 | — | 6.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Meizhou Hakka | 14.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Yanbian Longding | 8.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Jiangxi Dingnan United | 16.0 | 14.0 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Dalian Kuncheng City | 10.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shanghai Port | 12.0 | 9.5 | 2.5 | 100% | 50% |
| 0 | Shenzhen Peng City | 14.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Beijing Guoan | 11.5 | 10.5 | 1.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Henan Songshan Longmen | 10.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 100% | 50% |
| 0 | Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shanghai Shenhua | 10.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 10.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Shandong Taishan | 11.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Yunnan Yukun | 12.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Qingdao West Coast | 5.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Zhejiang | 10.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Dalian Yingbo | 11.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Wuhan Three Towns | 13.5 | 8.5 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% |
| 0 | Qingdao Hainiu | 7.5 | 2.0 | 5.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Liaoning Tieren FC | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0% | 0% |
Gols por time
| # | Time | Média | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Ambos marcam |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Qingdao Fuli | 1.5 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Shanghai Imair | 5.5 | 100% | 100% | 50% |
| 0 | Chongqing Handa | 2.0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 0 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2.0 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Shanghai Segenda | 2.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 0 | Guangdong Shudihong | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | 50% |
| 0 | Dalian Kewei | 1.8 | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 0 | Yulin Miners | 3.7 | 100% | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Xiamen Chengyi | 1.5 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 1.3 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 0 | Hubei Istar | 2.7 | 67% | 67% | 33% |
| 0 | Ningxia Pingluo |