Estatísticas de Cantos da China PR League Two
A média é de 8.8 cantos por jogo na China PR League Two. Veja abaixo as médias por equipa e as percentagens de over 8.5–9.5.
Média de cantos por jogo: 8.8
Cantos por equipa
| # | Equipa | Média | A favor | Contra | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan II | 9.9 | 5.5 | 4.4 | 65% | 65% |
| 1 | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic | 7.9 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 38% | 31% |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 8.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 44% | 44% |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 9.9 | 5.9 | 4.0 | 59% | 53% |
| 3 | Dalian Kewei | 10.0 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 65% | 59% |
| 3 | Hubei Istar | 8.0 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 25% | 25% |
| 4 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 9.4 | 3.4 | 6.0 | 56% | 44% |
| 4 | Xiamen Feilu | 8.9 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 56% | 38% |
| 4 | Xiamen 1026 | — | — | — | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 8.0 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 50% | 31% |
| 5 | Jiangxi Lushan | 8.0 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 38% | 31% |
| 6 | Dalian Yingbo B | 10.1 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 69% | 63% |
| 6 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 6.9 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 29% | 18% |
| 7 | Qingdao Red Lions | 9.2 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 59% | 41% |
| 7 | Hangzhou Linping Wuyue | 8.1 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 47% | 24% |
| 8 | Haimen Codion | 9.6 | 6.1 | 3.4 | 50% | 38% |
| 8 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 7.8 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 47% | 41% |
| 9 | Lanzhou Longyuan | 10.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 60% | 53% |
| 9 | Guangdong Mingtu | 8.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 53% | 35% |
| 10 | Changchun Xidu | 8.5 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 31% | 19% |
| 10 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 8.7 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 41% | 35% |
| 11 | Shanghai Segenda | 7.7 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 40% | 27% |
| 11 | Wenzhou | 8.9 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 56% | 44% |
| 12 | Beijing BIT | 11.1 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 80% | 60% |
| 12 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 8.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 44% | 38% |
Golos por equipa
| # | Equipa | Média | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Ambas marcam |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan II | 2.3 | 59% | 47% | 47% |
| 1 | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic | 2.1 | 56% | 31% | 25% |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 2.4 | 63% | 44% | 44% |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 2.8 | 82% | 65% | 65% |
| 3 | Dalian Kewei | 1.3 | 41% | 24% | 29% |
| 3 | Hubei Istar | 2.4 | 63% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 2.3 | 75% | 44% | 38% |
| 4 | Xiamen Feilu | 2.6 | 69% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | Xiamen 1026 | — | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 1.9 | 50% | 38% | 50% |
| 5 | Jiangxi Lushan | 2.1 | 69% | 38% | 44% |
| 6 | Dalian Yingbo B |